>A. Accumulate at a FAR slower rate as the helpful suggests it
>is for multiple combat with foes, not 8-10 round I win.

If that happened I think we would need more legacies aimed at elves. Which I'm totally okay with...and you would probably still complain about. Honestly, elves really suck until about 40+. The low HP is horrible at low levels, you know plus vuln iron or mithril. With the right gear, it is okay but still.

>B. Lower the variety of abilities. Giving a warrior cut off
>seems redundant with the amount of lagging ability.

I think the cut off ability gives you the advantage of using a spec that doesnt have any lagging ability, such as sword or dagger. Most characters can fly or have enlarge/reduce to avoid their other lag options. I dont have access to stats, but I'd assume most elves are sword or dagger. There are exceptions. With low str some of the heavier options are out such as polearm and most axes.

>C. Be removed entirely. Can argue all night long about this
>one, but the game would be better off if the legacy was
>scrapped.
>Note I also mean one or the other, not all of these.

Really your only direct counter is to kill them quickly or use an edge that I have no idea how effective it is. Maybe it does need slight balancing. But I'd rather see more interesting options than see it taken away entirely.