464, Stick with one set of stats.
Posted by Eskelian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
If you want to argue a point, try to argue what I'm arguing.
Your link states a 19% increase (high value), of lung cancer by having a career that continually exposes you to second-hand smoke. Your base likelihood, which is going up 19%, starts off at less than 1%, as of March of this year. What's 19% of 1%? 1.19%? AKA, an incredibly small number.
|