Oddly enough, this is almost exactly my position. It's one I've used to argue against people who basically think evolution (and cosmology/big bang theory/etc.) are at odds with God. Which is more difficult, to design a system which is internally self consistent from which intelligent life arises naturally, or to conjure it up from nothingness. A self consistent universe is elegant. One which is not would prove the existence of God (or something similar). Funny how a lot of people of "faith" are really just people still searching for proof. To accept there will never be proof (and never *can* be proof) takes a lot more faith IMHO.