>Listen. I could name 30 or so players right now that would
>love to contribute to the game more than just with PBF's and
>players. However, 98% of them are either unwilling are not
>skilled enough to get through the 'application' process to be
>an IMM. Therefore, if you aren't going to act like an admin
>and all the #### that comes with it, sack up and admit it and
>become a player like the rest of us. Losing an IMM or two who
>can't abide by a certain level of respect and decorum isn't
>going to ruin the playerbase. ####, by my count, since I had
>my first character we've lost over 6 imms that I thought were
>top draw, and they haven't been replaced really (sorry
>Enlilth, Netoulda).

So in other words, you think there aren't enough good imms, and the solution to that is to have less imms overall.

>The crux of my argument is: If you treat players in a certain
>antagonistic way, then why are shocked when the player reacts
>to certain situations with skepticism and anger? And
>furthermore, why are you then treating a certain player
>different than all others solely on the basis of his PLAYER
>(who btw, has never been accused of cheating as far as I
>know).

I don't even know what would make you think that.

I mean, did I treat Waris differently because of Waris's bitchy prays? Probably. Did I know who played Waris at the time? No. Would I have reacted the same way to anyone else praying bitchy things over a hundred times? I can't see how anyone would reasonably say no.