>>Which part of chaos do you disagree with, the
>>unpredictability or the anti-order?
>
>
>Part of that is being unpredictable,
>Partly, though chaos can also be achieved by being
>predictable, it just depends as to what part you are playing
>in the big puzzle.
>
>but chaos is anti-order as well.
>Chaos is chaos, not anti-anything.
For chaos to be chaos, it is going to be anti-order. Whether you want to admit it or not is a matter of choice.
>
>
>Chaos isn't just do whatever you want whenever you feel
>like it.
>You just stated that you consider unpredictability to be
>chaotic, so what's changed?
If you are doing it to enhance order, it is not chaos.
>
>
>If you are ... a tool to enhance order, you can expect me
>to get upset.
>I didn't understand how a chaotic killing a chaotic can be
>considering enhancing order, since surely there may have been
>some confusion to the orderly.
The chaotic didn't kill the chaotic. All he did was keep helping the orderly. He not once did not agree to help the orderly when asked. He became a tool/slave. If you are a tool or a slave, you will get the smackdown in my religion.
>
>
>Chaos is chaos but players are mere mortals, they cannot truly
>exist in the chaotic world, they are influenced by this sphere
>and direct events towards a destabilisation or use chaos
>magicks or something towards the furtherance of chaos.
>Obviously my view on things has been heavily tainted by
>Warhammer chaos and i consider that warbands of Orcs can bring
>about Chaos. There is order and leadership but in the end, a
>greater state of Chaos is brought about by Orderly actions.
There are different types of chaos, but how chaos relates to my religion, hence the subject, My religion, is exactly as I state it.
>
>
>Similarly i can't help contrast your comments with very old
>entropy to find an altogether more restrictive view of chaos.
>Hence why i ask, must i realign my views of Chaos or is there
>still rampant opportunity? i.e. i'd be extremely miffed by
>comment had i been playing that chaotic character (whom i've
>never met nor knowing anything of)
You can think of chaos as you wish. In my religion it is tied to wisdom for the express purpose of not being like Entropy. If he was setting up the orderly for a beating, that would have been fine. But there was not a single thing in a role, in his actions or demeanor to suggest he was doing anything of the sort. What he was doing was walking the fence, either he was going to do something special with his actions or crash and burn. That is one of the risks of being part of my religion.