>You seem pretty defensive about this - let me clear the air a
>bit - out of what seemed like a lot of gank-happy Villagers,
>it was surprising (and refreshing) that Olum, as a *Defender*,
>was one of the most concerned about the odds being even. It
>didn't seem like many of you were, at all, but Olum did stand
>out as one who at least paid some sort of attention to it.
>Even if accidents did happen, still.

Under the commander we had, parity was stressed. I don't believe that as a defender Olum was exempt. Also, I didn't have many non-berserkers to gang with, so it was easier to just not gang.

I am a bit defensive mostly because I expected better from Tavlin than to speak as if all villagers were gank happy, but I think that might be a bit of Twist (the person) bleeding through. I played a few ragers in a row and it gets really old being constantly accused of ganging, especially from a respected enemy, but doubly so when you know you are going out of your way to NOT gang (and subsequently you die horribly to Chulun over and over.)

No need to respond, I just wanted it to be clear why I was defensive.